| 
	28 maggio 2008
 «London’s West End is once again the world’s most expensive office market, 
	while rapidly-rising Moscow climbed to second place, according to CB Richard 
	Ellis Group, Inc. (CBRE) Research’s semi-annual Global Market Rents survey. 
	The report tracks world markets with the highest as well as fastest-growing 
	occupancy costs for the 12 months ended March 31, 2008. Tokyo’s Inner 
	Central Five Wards, Mumbai’s Nariman Point and Tokyo’s Outer Central Five 
	Wards rounded out the top five most expensive markets.
 
 "Office occupancy costs are continuing to defy sluggish economic conditions 
	and the credit crunch, as they rise faster than global inflation," said Dr. 
	Raymond Torto, CBRE’s Global Chief Economist. "These cost increases are 
	dominated by emerging markets, caused by both supply and demand imbalance 
	and the depreciation of the dollar relative to local currencies. In some of 
	these emerging markets, Class A office space is seriously lacking."
 
 Ho Chi Minh City had the fastest-growing occupancy costs during this period, 
	up 94%. Moscow was not far behind at 93%, followed by Singapore at 86%. 
	Overall, EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) dominated the list of markets 
	with the fastest growing occupancy costs, accounting for five of the top 10 
	and 19 of the top 50 markets. Worldwide, 88% of the 173 office markets 
	monitored posted higher occupancy costs.
 
 Among the most expensive markets, Singapore and Dubai were newcomers to the 
	top 10. Singapore ranked ninth with an occupancy cost of $139.31 (occupancy 
	cost in US$/sq. ft./annum used throughout this release), while Dubai debuted 
	at number 10 with an occupancy cost of $128.49. With a near-doubling of 
	occupancy costs, Moscow rose four places to second at $232.37. Midtown 
	Manhattan was still the priciest market in North America, at $103.43, and 
	ranked number 13 worldwide.
 
 Asia Pacific
 Ho Chi Minh City jumped from 45th to 23rd most expensive globally, with 
	occupancy costs rising to $85.84. Occupancy costs in Tokyo’s Inner Central 
	Five Wards rose to $220.25, while Tokyo’s Outer Central Five Wards increased 
	to $175.35. Perth, Australia, joined the top 50 most expensive, coming in at 
	number 41. Asia Pacific had 11 markets among the 50 with the fastest growing 
	occupancy costs, paced by Singapore (86%) and Mumbai (41%).
 
 
 Europe
 At $299.54, London’s West End remained the world’s most expensive office 
	market. Occupancy costs in that market are 29% higher than Moscow, where 
	occupancy costs rose to $232.37, the world’s second-most expensive; and 82% 
	more than the City of London’s $164.18 occupancy cost. In Europe, occupancy 
	costs grew fastest in Moscow, with a 93% increase, and Oslo, Norway, with a 
	58% increase.
 
 Americas
 Four North American cities are among the world’s Top 50 most expensive 
	office markets: Midtown Manhattan (13th at $103.43); Calgary Central 
	Business District (CBD) (42nd at $66.27); Toronto CBD (47th at $62.44); and 
	suburban Los Angeles (48th at $62.06). Rio de Janeiro rose to $74.60 (32nd), 
	while São Paulo increased seven spots to 35th at $71.41. North America 
	totaled 16 of the top 50 markets with the fastest growing occupancy costs. 
	The fastest gains were recorded by Miami (29%), Panama City (28%), Seattle 
	(26%) and Houston (25%).
 
 Top Ten Most Expensive Markets Top Ten Markets with Fastest Growing 
	Occupancy Costs
 
 (In US$ per sq. ft. per annum) (In local currency & measure)
 
 1. London (West End), England 1. Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
 
 2. Moscow, Russia 2. Moscow, Russia
 
 3. Tokyo (Inner Central), Japan 3. Singapore
 
 4. Mumbai, India 4. Nicosia, Cyprus*
 
 5. Tokyo (Outer Central), Japan 5. Oslo, Norway
 
 6. London (City), England 6. Tel Aviv, Israel
 
 7. New Delhi, India 7. Dubai, United Arab Emirates
 
 8. Paris, France 8. Mumbai, India
 
 9. Singapore 9. Manila, Philippines
 
 10. Dubai, United Arab Emirates 10. Perth, Australia
 
 *Nicosia, Cyprus, adopted the Euro at the start of 2008. The Euro equivalent 
	has been used to calculate percentage change.
 
 Note: The full Top 50 Most Expensive and Top 50 Markets with Fastest Growing 
	Occupancy Costs charts are located at the end of this press release.
 
 About CB Richard Ellis
 CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. (NYSE:CBG), a Fortune 500 and S&P 500 company 
	headquartered in Los Angeles, is the world’s largest commercial real estate 
	services firm (in terms of 2007 revenue). With over 29,000 employees, the 
	Company serves real estate owners, investors and occupiers through more than 
	300 offices worldwide (excluding affiliate offices). CB Richard Ellis offers 
	strategic advice and execution for property sales and leasing; corporate 
	services; property, facilities and project management; mortgage banking; 
	appraisal and valuation; development services; investment management; and 
	research and consulting. CB Richard Ellis is the only commercial real estate 
	services company named one of the 50 "best in class" companies by 
	BusinessWeek, and was also named one of the 100 fastest growing companies by 
	Fortune. Please visit our Web site at www.cbre.com.
 
 
 Notes to Editors
 
 1. Global Market Rents is a survey of office occupation costs in 173 cities 
	worldwide.
 
 
 2. The Fastest Growing ranking is based upon occupancy costs in local 
	currency and measure. The Most Expensive ranking is based upon occupancy 
	costs in US$ per sq. ft. per annum.
 
 
 3. The figures given in this release refer to occupancy cost. This 
	represents rent, plus local taxes and service charges. The occupation cost 
	figures have also been adjusted to reflect different measurement practices 
	from market to market.
 
 
 4. To obtain a full copy of the report or to arrange to speak with a CBRE 
	expert, please contact Robert McGrath at 212.984.8267 or
	robert.mcgrath@cbre.com.
 
	Top 50 Most Expensive Office Markets as of May 2008
 
 
 
		
		
			
				| Rank  | Market  | US$/sq ft/annum | € /sq m/month 
				 | £/sq ft/annum | Aus $/sq m/annum 
				 | Can$/sq ft/annum | ¥ /sq ft/annum |  
				| 1  | London (West End), England
				 | 299.54  | 169.57  | 150.70  | 3,532  | 307.36  | 29,815  |  
				| 2  | Moscow, Russia 
				 | 232.37  | 131.54  | 116.90  | 2,740  | 238.43  | 23,129  |  
				| 3  | Tokyo (Inner Central), 
				Japan  | 220.25  | 124.68  | 110.81  | 2,597  | 226.00  | 21,922  |  
				| 4  | Mumbai, India 
				 | 210.97  | 119.43  | 106.14  | 2,488  | 216.47  | 20,999  |  
				| 5  | Tokyo (Outer Central), 
				Japan  | 175.35  | 99.27  | 88.22  | 2,068  | 179.93  | 17,454  |  
				| 6  | London (City), England
				 | 164.18  | 92.94  | 82.60  | 1,936  | 168.47  | 16,342  |  
				| 7  | New Delhi, India 
				 | 145.16  | 82.18  | 73.03  | 1,712  | 148.95  | 14,449  |  
				| 8  | Paris, France 
				 | 141.98  | 80.38  | 71.43  | 1,674  | 145.69  | 14,132  |  
				| 9  | Singapore, Singapore
				 | 139.31  | 78.86  | 70.09  | 1,643  | 142.95  | 13,866  |  
				| 10  | Dubai, United Arab 
				Emirates  | 128.49  | 72.73  | 64.64  | 1,515  | 131.84  | 12,789  |  
				| 11  | Hong Kong  | 126.79  | 71.77  | 63.79  | 1,495  | 130.10  | 12,620  |  
				| 12  | Dublin, Ireland 
				 | 126.60  | 71.67  | 63.69  | 1,493  | 129.90  | 12,601  |  
				| 13  | New York Midtown, United 
				States  | 103.43  | 58.55  | 52.04  | 1,220  | 106.13  | 10,295  |  
				| 14  | Paris La Defense, France
				 | 103.20  | 58.42  | 51.92  | 1,217  | 105.90  | 10,272  |  
				| 15  | Birmingham, England 
				 | 100.38  | 56.82  | 50.50  | 1,184  | 103.00  | 9,991  |  
				| 16  | Oslo, Norway 
				 | 97.30  | 55.08  | 48.95  | 1,147  | 99.84  | 9,685  |  
				| 17  | Madrid, Spain 
				 | 96.64  | 54.71  | 48.62  | 1,140  | 99.16  | 9,619  |  
				| 18  | Zurich, Switzerland 
				 | 92.99  | 52.64  | 46.78  | 1,096  | 95.41  | 9,256  |  
				| 19  | Luxembourg City, 
				Luxembourg  | 92.78  | 52.52  | 46.68  | 1,094  | 95.20  | 9,235  |  
				| 20  | Edinburgh, Scotland 
				 | 92.43  | 52.32  | 46.50  | 1,090  | 94.84  | 9,200  |  
				| 21  | Manchester, England 
				 | 87.46  | 49.51  | 44.00  | 1,031  | 89.74  | 8,705  |  
				| 22  | Stockholm, Sweden 
				 | 86.69  | 49.07  | 43.61  | 1,022  | 88.95  | 8,629  |  
				| 23  | Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
				 | 85.84  | 48.59  | 43.19  | 1,012  | 88.08  | 8,544  |  
				| 24  | Milan, Italy 
				 | 85.41  | 48.35  | 42.97  | 1,007  | 87.64  | 8,502  |  
				| 25  | Abu Dhabi, United Arab 
				Emirates  | 84.14  | 47.63  | 42.33  | 992  | 86.33  | 8,375  |  
				| 26  | Frankfurt am Main, Germany
				 | 82.63  | 46.77  | 41.57  | 974  | 84.78  | 8,224  |  
				| 27  | Bristol, England 
				 | 81.49  | 46.13  | 41.00  | 961  | 83.62  | 8,112  |  
				| 28  | Glasgow, Scotland 
				 | 80.50  | 45.57  | 40.50  | 949  | 82.60  | 8,013  |  
				| 29  | Geneva, Switzerland 
				 | 78.43  | 44.40  | 39.46  | 925  | 80.48  | 7,806  |  
				| 30  | Warsaw, Poland 
				 | 76.55  | 43.33  | 38.51  | 903  | 78.55  | 7,619  |  
				| 31  | Leeds, England 
				 | 76.53  | 43.32  | 38.50  | 902  | 78.52  | 7,617  |  
				| 32  | Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
				 | 74.60  | 42.23  | 37.53  | 880  | 76.54  | 7,425  |    
			
				| 33  | Athens, Greece 
				 | 73.79  | 41.77  | 37.13  | 870  | 75.72  | 7,345  |  
				| 34  | Aberdeen, Scotland 
				 | 72.55  | 41.07  | 36.50  | 856  | 74.44  | 7,221  |  
				| 35  | São Paulo, Brazil 
				 | 71.41  | 40.42  | 35.93  | 842  | 73.27  | 7,108  |  
				| 36  | Seoul, South Korea 
				 | 71.40  | 40.42  | 35.92  | 842  | 73.26  | 7,107  |  
				| 37  | Rome, Italy  | 71.18  | 40.29  | 35.81  | 839  | 73.04  | 7,085  |  
				| 38  | Sydney (Core), Australia
				 | 68.52  | 38.79  | 34.47  | 808  | 70.31  | 6,820  |  
				| 39  | Shanghai (Pudong), China
				 | 68.45  | 38.75  | 34.44  | 807  | 70.23  | 6,813  |  
				| 40  | Munich, Germany 
				 | 67.55  | 38.24  | 33.99  | 797  | 69.32  | 6,724  |  
				| 41  | Perth, Australia 
				 | 66.58  | 37.69  | 33.50  | 785  | 68.32  | 6,627  |  
				| 42  | Calgary, Canada (CBD)
				 | 66.27  | 37.52  | 33.34  | 781  | 68.00  | 6,596  |  
				| 43  | Brussels, Belgium 
				 | 64.77  | 36.67  | 32.59  | 764  | 66.46  | 6,447  |  
				| 44  | Liverpool, England 
				 | 64.60  | 36.57  | 32.50  | 762  | 66.29  | 6,430  |  
				| 45  | Barcelona, Spain 
				 | 64.43  | 36.47  | 32.41  | 760  | 66.11  | 6,413  |  
				| 46  | Brisbane, Australia 
				 | 63.32  | 35.84  | 31.86  | 747  | 64.97  | 6,303  |  
				| 47  | Toronto, Canada (CBD)
				 | 62.44  | 35.35  | 31.41  | 736  | 64.07  | 6,215  |  
				| 48  | Los Angeles (sub), United 
				States  | 62.06  | 35.13  | 31.22  | 732  | 63.68  | 6,177  |  
				| 49  | Jersey, England 
				 | 61.46  | 34.79  | 30.92  | 725  | 63.06  | 6,117  |  
				| 50  | Shanghai (Puxi), China
				 | 61.26  | 34.68  | 30.82  | 722  | 62.86  | 6,097  |  
	Source: CBRE Research 
 
 The Top 50 Markets with Fastest-Growing Occupancy Costs as of May 2008 (ranked 
	by 12-month % change increases in local currency & measure)
 
 
		
		
			
				| Rank  | Market  | % Change 
				 |  
				| 1  | Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
				 | 94.4  |  
				| 2  | Moscow, Russia 
				 | 92.7  |  
				| 3  | Singapore, Singapore
				 | 86.0  |  
				| 4  | Nicosia, Cyprus 
				 | 58.0  |  
				| 5  | Oslo, Norway 
				 | 57.6  |  
				| 6  | Tel Aviv, Israel 
				 | 53.2  |  
				| 7  | Dubai, United Arab 
				Emirates  | 43.4  |  
				| 8  | Mumbai, India 
				 | 40.7  |  
				| 9  | Manila, Philippines 
				 | 32.7  |  
				| 10  | Perth, Australia 
				 | 32.3  |  
				| 11  | Warsaw, Poland 
				 | 32.2  |  
				| 12  | Liverpool, England 
				 | 30.0  |  
				| 13  | Hong Kong  | 29.9  |  
				| 14  | Miami (suburban), United 
				States  | 28.9  |  
				| 15  | Panama City, Panama 
				 | 28.3  |  
				| 16  | Seattle (CBD), United 
				States  | 25.8  |  
				| 17  | Houston, United States
				 | 24.7  |  
				| 18  | Sydney (Core), Australia
				 | 23.2  |  
				| 19  | São Paulo, Brazil 
				 | 23.1  |  
				| 20  | Prague, Czech Republic
				 | 22.8  |  
				| 21  | New York Midtown, United 
				States  | 22.7  |  
				| 22  | Bangalore, India 
				 | 22.6  |  
				| 23  | London (West End), England
				 | 22.5  |  
				| 24  | Edmonton, Canada 
				 | 22.5  |    
			
				| 25  | San Francisco, United 
				States  | 22.0  |  
				| 26  | Los Angeles (suburban), 
				United States  | 21.7  |  
				| 27  | Brisbane, Australia 
				 | 20.1  |  
				| 28  | Miami (CBD), United States
				 | 19.8  |  
				| 29  | Rome, Italy  | 18.7  |  
				| 30  | Los Angeles (CBD), United 
				States  | 18.6  |  
				| 31  | Gothenburg, Sweden 
				 | 18.3  |  
				| 32  | Seattle (suburban), United 
				States  | 17.8  |  
				| 33  | Istanbul, Turkey 
				 | 17.7  |  
				| 34  | Johannesburg (Sandton), 
				South Africa  | 17.7  |  
				| 35  | Athens, Greece 
				 | 17.6  |  
				| 36  | Bristol, England 
				 | 17.1  |  
				| 37  | Paris La Defense, France
				 | 17.1  |  
				| 38  | Buenos Aires, Argentina
				 | 16.9  |  
				| 39  | Stockholm, Sweden 
				 | 16.9  |  
				| 40  | Calgary, Canada (suburban)
				 | 16.7  |  
				| 41  | Christchurch, New Zealand
				 | 16.7  |  
				| 42  | Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
				 | 15.8  |  
				| 43  | Vancouver, Canada (suburban)
				 | 15.5  |  
				| 44  | New York Downtown, United 
				States  | 15.4  |  
				| 45  | New Delhi, India 
				 | 15.3  |  
				| 46  | Boston (suburban), United 
				States  | 15.3  |  
				| 47  | Vancouver, Canada (CBD)
				 | 15.2  |  
				| 48  | Bratislava, Slovakia
				 | 14.7  |  
				| 49  | Lyon,France  | 14.5  |  
				| 50  | Albuquerque, United States
				 | 14.5  |  
	Source: CBRE Research. (CS della Società)
 |