28 maggio 2008
«London’s West End is once again the world’s most expensive office market,
while rapidly-rising Moscow climbed to second place, according to CB Richard
Ellis Group, Inc. (CBRE) Research’s semi-annual Global Market Rents survey.
The report tracks world markets with the highest as well as fastest-growing
occupancy costs for the 12 months ended March 31, 2008. Tokyo’s Inner
Central Five Wards, Mumbai’s Nariman Point and Tokyo’s Outer Central Five
Wards rounded out the top five most expensive markets.
"Office occupancy costs are continuing to defy sluggish economic conditions
and the credit crunch, as they rise faster than global inflation," said Dr.
Raymond Torto, CBRE’s Global Chief Economist. "These cost increases are
dominated by emerging markets, caused by both supply and demand imbalance
and the depreciation of the dollar relative to local currencies. In some of
these emerging markets, Class A office space is seriously lacking."
Ho Chi Minh City had the fastest-growing occupancy costs during this period,
up 94%. Moscow was not far behind at 93%, followed by Singapore at 86%.
Overall, EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) dominated the list of markets
with the fastest growing occupancy costs, accounting for five of the top 10
and 19 of the top 50 markets. Worldwide, 88% of the 173 office markets
monitored posted higher occupancy costs.
Among the most expensive markets, Singapore and Dubai were newcomers to the
top 10. Singapore ranked ninth with an occupancy cost of $139.31 (occupancy
cost in US$/sq. ft./annum used throughout this release), while Dubai debuted
at number 10 with an occupancy cost of $128.49. With a near-doubling of
occupancy costs, Moscow rose four places to second at $232.37. Midtown
Manhattan was still the priciest market in North America, at $103.43, and
ranked number 13 worldwide.
Asia Pacific
Ho Chi Minh City jumped from 45th to 23rd most expensive globally, with
occupancy costs rising to $85.84. Occupancy costs in Tokyo’s Inner Central
Five Wards rose to $220.25, while Tokyo’s Outer Central Five Wards increased
to $175.35. Perth, Australia, joined the top 50 most expensive, coming in at
number 41. Asia Pacific had 11 markets among the 50 with the fastest growing
occupancy costs, paced by Singapore (86%) and Mumbai (41%).
Europe
At $299.54, London’s West End remained the world’s most expensive office
market. Occupancy costs in that market are 29% higher than Moscow, where
occupancy costs rose to $232.37, the world’s second-most expensive; and 82%
more than the City of London’s $164.18 occupancy cost. In Europe, occupancy
costs grew fastest in Moscow, with a 93% increase, and Oslo, Norway, with a
58% increase.
Americas
Four North American cities are among the world’s Top 50 most expensive
office markets: Midtown Manhattan (13th at $103.43); Calgary Central
Business District (CBD) (42nd at $66.27); Toronto CBD (47th at $62.44); and
suburban Los Angeles (48th at $62.06). Rio de Janeiro rose to $74.60 (32nd),
while São Paulo increased seven spots to 35th at $71.41. North America
totaled 16 of the top 50 markets with the fastest growing occupancy costs.
The fastest gains were recorded by Miami (29%), Panama City (28%), Seattle
(26%) and Houston (25%).
Top Ten Most Expensive Markets Top Ten Markets with Fastest Growing
Occupancy Costs
(In US$ per sq. ft. per annum) (In local currency & measure)
1. London (West End), England 1. Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
2. Moscow, Russia 2. Moscow, Russia
3. Tokyo (Inner Central), Japan 3. Singapore
4. Mumbai, India 4. Nicosia, Cyprus*
5. Tokyo (Outer Central), Japan 5. Oslo, Norway
6. London (City), England 6. Tel Aviv, Israel
7. New Delhi, India 7. Dubai, United Arab Emirates
8. Paris, France 8. Mumbai, India
9. Singapore 9. Manila, Philippines
10. Dubai, United Arab Emirates 10. Perth, Australia
*Nicosia, Cyprus, adopted the Euro at the start of 2008. The Euro equivalent
has been used to calculate percentage change.
Note: The full Top 50 Most Expensive and Top 50 Markets with Fastest Growing
Occupancy Costs charts are located at the end of this press release.
About CB Richard Ellis
CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. (NYSE:CBG), a Fortune 500 and S&P 500 company
headquartered in Los Angeles, is the world’s largest commercial real estate
services firm (in terms of 2007 revenue). With over 29,000 employees, the
Company serves real estate owners, investors and occupiers through more than
300 offices worldwide (excluding affiliate offices). CB Richard Ellis offers
strategic advice and execution for property sales and leasing; corporate
services; property, facilities and project management; mortgage banking;
appraisal and valuation; development services; investment management; and
research and consulting. CB Richard Ellis is the only commercial real estate
services company named one of the 50 "best in class" companies by
BusinessWeek, and was also named one of the 100 fastest growing companies by
Fortune. Please visit our Web site at www.cbre.com.
Notes to Editors
1. Global Market Rents is a survey of office occupation costs in 173 cities
worldwide.
2. The Fastest Growing ranking is based upon occupancy costs in local
currency and measure. The Most Expensive ranking is based upon occupancy
costs in US$ per sq. ft. per annum.
3. The figures given in this release refer to occupancy cost. This
represents rent, plus local taxes and service charges. The occupation cost
figures have also been adjusted to reflect different measurement practices
from market to market.
4. To obtain a full copy of the report or to arrange to speak with a CBRE
expert, please contact Robert McGrath at 212.984.8267 or
robert.mcgrath@cbre.com.
Top 50 Most Expensive Office Markets as of May 2008
Rank
|
Market
|
US$/sq ft/annum |
€ /sq m/month
|
£/sq ft/annum |
Aus $/sq m/annum
|
Can$/sq ft/annum |
¥ /sq ft/annum |
1 |
London (West End), England
|
299.54 |
169.57 |
150.70 |
3,532 |
307.36 |
29,815 |
2 |
Moscow, Russia
|
232.37 |
131.54 |
116.90 |
2,740 |
238.43 |
23,129 |
3 |
Tokyo (Inner Central),
Japan |
220.25 |
124.68 |
110.81 |
2,597 |
226.00 |
21,922 |
4 |
Mumbai, India
|
210.97 |
119.43 |
106.14 |
2,488 |
216.47 |
20,999 |
5 |
Tokyo (Outer Central),
Japan |
175.35 |
99.27 |
88.22 |
2,068 |
179.93 |
17,454 |
6 |
London (City), England
|
164.18 |
92.94 |
82.60 |
1,936 |
168.47 |
16,342 |
7 |
New Delhi, India
|
145.16 |
82.18 |
73.03 |
1,712 |
148.95 |
14,449 |
8 |
Paris, France
|
141.98 |
80.38 |
71.43 |
1,674 |
145.69 |
14,132 |
9 |
Singapore, Singapore
|
139.31 |
78.86 |
70.09 |
1,643 |
142.95 |
13,866 |
10 |
Dubai, United Arab
Emirates |
128.49 |
72.73 |
64.64 |
1,515 |
131.84 |
12,789 |
11 |
Hong Kong
|
126.79 |
71.77 |
63.79 |
1,495 |
130.10 |
12,620 |
12 |
Dublin, Ireland
|
126.60 |
71.67 |
63.69 |
1,493 |
129.90 |
12,601 |
13 |
New York Midtown, United
States |
103.43 |
58.55 |
52.04 |
1,220 |
106.13 |
10,295 |
14 |
Paris La Defense, France
|
103.20 |
58.42 |
51.92 |
1,217 |
105.90 |
10,272 |
15 |
Birmingham, England
|
100.38 |
56.82 |
50.50 |
1,184 |
103.00 |
9,991 |
16 |
Oslo, Norway
|
97.30 |
55.08 |
48.95 |
1,147 |
99.84 |
9,685 |
17 |
Madrid, Spain
|
96.64 |
54.71 |
48.62 |
1,140 |
99.16 |
9,619 |
18 |
Zurich, Switzerland
|
92.99 |
52.64 |
46.78 |
1,096 |
95.41 |
9,256 |
19 |
Luxembourg City,
Luxembourg |
92.78 |
52.52 |
46.68 |
1,094 |
95.20 |
9,235 |
20 |
Edinburgh, Scotland
|
92.43 |
52.32 |
46.50 |
1,090 |
94.84 |
9,200 |
21 |
Manchester, England
|
87.46 |
49.51 |
44.00 |
1,031 |
89.74 |
8,705 |
22 |
Stockholm, Sweden
|
86.69 |
49.07 |
43.61 |
1,022 |
88.95 |
8,629 |
23 |
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
|
85.84 |
48.59 |
43.19 |
1,012 |
88.08 |
8,544 |
24 |
Milan, Italy
|
85.41 |
48.35 |
42.97 |
1,007 |
87.64 |
8,502 |
25 |
Abu Dhabi, United Arab
Emirates |
84.14 |
47.63 |
42.33 |
992 |
86.33 |
8,375 |
26 |
Frankfurt am Main, Germany
|
82.63 |
46.77 |
41.57 |
974 |
84.78 |
8,224 |
27 |
Bristol, England
|
81.49 |
46.13 |
41.00 |
961 |
83.62 |
8,112 |
28 |
Glasgow, Scotland
|
80.50 |
45.57 |
40.50 |
949 |
82.60 |
8,013 |
29 |
Geneva, Switzerland
|
78.43 |
44.40 |
39.46 |
925 |
80.48 |
7,806 |
30 |
Warsaw, Poland
|
76.55 |
43.33 |
38.51 |
903 |
78.55 |
7,619 |
31 |
Leeds, England
|
76.53 |
43.32 |
38.50 |
902 |
78.52 |
7,617 |
32 |
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
|
74.60 |
42.23 |
37.53 |
880 |
76.54 |
7,425 |
33 |
Athens, Greece
|
73.79 |
41.77 |
37.13 |
870 |
75.72 |
7,345 |
34 |
Aberdeen, Scotland
|
72.55 |
41.07 |
36.50 |
856 |
74.44 |
7,221 |
35 |
São Paulo, Brazil
|
71.41 |
40.42 |
35.93 |
842 |
73.27 |
7,108 |
36 |
Seoul, South Korea
|
71.40 |
40.42 |
35.92 |
842 |
73.26 |
7,107 |
37 |
Rome, Italy
|
71.18 |
40.29 |
35.81 |
839 |
73.04 |
7,085 |
38 |
Sydney (Core), Australia
|
68.52 |
38.79 |
34.47 |
808 |
70.31 |
6,820 |
39 |
Shanghai (Pudong), China
|
68.45 |
38.75 |
34.44 |
807 |
70.23 |
6,813 |
40 |
Munich, Germany
|
67.55 |
38.24 |
33.99 |
797 |
69.32 |
6,724 |
41 |
Perth, Australia
|
66.58 |
37.69 |
33.50 |
785 |
68.32 |
6,627 |
42 |
Calgary, Canada (CBD)
|
66.27 |
37.52 |
33.34 |
781 |
68.00 |
6,596 |
43 |
Brussels, Belgium
|
64.77 |
36.67 |
32.59 |
764 |
66.46 |
6,447 |
44 |
Liverpool, England
|
64.60 |
36.57 |
32.50 |
762 |
66.29 |
6,430 |
45 |
Barcelona, Spain
|
64.43 |
36.47 |
32.41 |
760 |
66.11 |
6,413 |
46 |
Brisbane, Australia
|
63.32 |
35.84 |
31.86 |
747 |
64.97 |
6,303 |
47 |
Toronto, Canada (CBD)
|
62.44 |
35.35 |
31.41 |
736 |
64.07 |
6,215 |
48 |
Los Angeles (sub), United
States |
62.06 |
35.13 |
31.22 |
732 |
63.68 |
6,177 |
49 |
Jersey, England
|
61.46 |
34.79 |
30.92 |
725 |
63.06 |
6,117 |
50 |
Shanghai (Puxi), China
|
61.26 |
34.68 |
30.82 |
722 |
62.86 |
6,097 |
Source: CBRE Research
The Top 50 Markets with Fastest-Growing Occupancy Costs as of May 2008 (ranked
by 12-month % change increases in local currency & measure)
Rank
|
Market
|
% Change
|
1 |
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
|
94.4 |
2 |
Moscow, Russia
|
92.7 |
3 |
Singapore, Singapore
|
86.0 |
4 |
Nicosia, Cyprus
|
58.0 |
5 |
Oslo, Norway
|
57.6 |
6 |
Tel Aviv, Israel
|
53.2 |
7 |
Dubai, United Arab
Emirates |
43.4 |
8 |
Mumbai, India
|
40.7 |
9 |
Manila, Philippines
|
32.7 |
10 |
Perth, Australia
|
32.3 |
11 |
Warsaw, Poland
|
32.2 |
12 |
Liverpool, England
|
30.0 |
13 |
Hong Kong
|
29.9 |
14 |
Miami (suburban), United
States |
28.9 |
15 |
Panama City, Panama
|
28.3 |
16 |
Seattle (CBD), United
States |
25.8 |
17 |
Houston, United States
|
24.7 |
18 |
Sydney (Core), Australia
|
23.2 |
19 |
São Paulo, Brazil
|
23.1 |
20 |
Prague, Czech Republic
|
22.8 |
21 |
New York Midtown, United
States |
22.7 |
22 |
Bangalore, India
|
22.6 |
23 |
London (West End), England
|
22.5 |
24 |
Edmonton, Canada
|
22.5 |
25 |
San Francisco, United
States |
22.0 |
26 |
Los Angeles (suburban),
United States |
21.7 |
27 |
Brisbane, Australia
|
20.1 |
28 |
Miami (CBD), United States
|
19.8 |
29 |
Rome, Italy
|
18.7 |
30 |
Los Angeles (CBD), United
States |
18.6 |
31 |
Gothenburg, Sweden
|
18.3 |
32 |
Seattle (suburban), United
States |
17.8 |
33 |
Istanbul, Turkey
|
17.7 |
34 |
Johannesburg (Sandton),
South Africa |
17.7 |
35 |
Athens, Greece
|
17.6 |
36 |
Bristol, England
|
17.1 |
37 |
Paris La Defense, France
|
17.1 |
38 |
Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
16.9 |
39 |
Stockholm, Sweden
|
16.9 |
40 |
Calgary, Canada (suburban)
|
16.7 |
41 |
Christchurch, New Zealand
|
16.7 |
42 |
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
|
15.8 |
43 |
Vancouver, Canada (suburban)
|
15.5 |
44 |
New York Downtown, United
States |
15.4 |
45 |
New Delhi, India
|
15.3 |
46 |
Boston (suburban), United
States |
15.3 |
47 |
Vancouver, Canada (CBD)
|
15.2 |
48 |
Bratislava, Slovakia
|
14.7 |
49 |
Lyon,France
|
14.5 |
50 |
Albuquerque, United States
|
14.5 |
Source: CBRE Research. (CS della Società) |